The age old question: would you suck a dick for 1 million

pretty_boy

gravedigger
☯ HQNP ☯
🌹 Slayer ❤
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Threads
1,816
Posts
11,570
Reputation
8,673
I remember ppl at school use to debate this a lot but here is the verdict


if you are truely a heterosexual male, then the act of sucking a man's penis should be no different sucking on a lollipop or a metal rod. just do it and get it over with for the absurd cash


people who reject the 1M are actually homosexuals in denial because they're scared they'd like it too much, and don't want to confront those feelings
 

Garlic

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Threads
6
Posts
48
Reputation
15
To a Christian you're asking them to commit a sin that could damn their soul to hellfire, you may as well ask if they would kill a baby for 1 million. And its something that cant happen in reality so its pointless anyway except for someone's gay fantasy.
 

megadrive

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2020
Threads
18
Posts
607
Reputation
309
It is true the biggest open homophobes in high school turned out to be gay. Whereas people like myself who flirted with effeminacy turned out straight. I agree its because I was "comfortable with my (hetero)sexuality while unknowingly having similar effeminate mannersims to a gay man mimicking female mating cues".

Regarding dick sucking. Never even played with another dude's dick during sleepovers during adolescence whether hand-jobs or blow jobs.
Although it was more common than you think amongst jocks who thought it "wasn't gay" as (Insert pathetic excuse from jocks for their latent gay sexuality). I read about these in male column confessions and jocks talking about "viewing porn together" or going "one handed skiing" in school.

Over-riding my disgust for sucking a dick, come on its a million pounds/dollars. That's not objectively a problem as its just phallic object no different from a sausage, a pork rib or lolipop correct.

But I believe in telegony so wouldn't want sperm anywhere near my mouth. Why do you think escorts use mouthwash so religiously? I wonder if this principle applies to gay men, or only women due to X Y chromosones and chimerisms during reproduction. I do know there is no female > male telegony though.
 
Last edited:

Mafia

looks theorist
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Threads
1,440
Posts
18,234
Reputation
14,713
Yeah.

To a Christian you're asking them to commit a sin that could damn their soul to hellfire, you may as well ask if they would kill a baby for 1 million. And its something that cant happen in reality so its pointless anyway except for someone's gay fantasy.
That's true.

I agree its because I was "comfortable with my (hetero)sexuality while unknowingly having similar effeminate mannersims to a gay man mimicking female mating cues".
Flamboyant people are very annoying I hope you are not like that.
 

megadrive

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2020
Threads
18
Posts
607
Reputation
309
Flamboyant people are very annoying I hope you are not like that.
Again lot of my posts are past-tense. Modern day gays are flamboyant and camp and I was nothing like that (in the 90s) and neither were gay men. We still referred to effeminate men as androgyny whether rock, metal, goth or indie. Don't ask don't tell was the policy on speculated sexuality of certain rockstars part of the mystique.

The horrendous garish car crash that is the modern lgbt scene is moreso tropical shirts, sleeveless t-shirts and men wearing shorts who shouldn't wear shorts.
 

Mafia

looks theorist
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Threads
1,440
Posts
18,234
Reputation
14,713
Again lot of my posts are past-tense. Modern day gays are flamboyant and camp and I was nothing like that (in the 90s) and neither were gay men.
I don't believe that. Gay people always had a reputation for being flamboyant and annoying.

The horrendous garish car crash that is the modern lgbt scene is moreso tropical shirts, sleeveless t-shirts and men wearing shorts who shouldn't wear shorts.
Gay people just dress tacky.
 

megadrive

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2020
Threads
18
Posts
607
Reputation
309
I don't believe that. Gay people always had a reputation for being flamboyant and annoying.
In the 90s UK gay bars were either all flag waivers or looking like a euro-trash pop video. Now because of marketing and over-representation they are now annoying.

Some gays though are just every day blokes and you wouldn't suspect a thing. But there are tell-tale signs.
 

Mafia

looks theorist
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Threads
1,440
Posts
18,234
Reputation
14,713
Some gays though are just every day blokes and you wouldn't suspect a thing. But there are tell-tale signs.
Probably beta males gone gay from rejection from women.
 

megadrive

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2020
Threads
18
Posts
607
Reputation
309
Probably beta males gone gay from rejection from women.
True. I think I read that only 3% of males are naturally homosexual, the rest is indoctrination or just impressionable vulnerable people.

Like psychologists in 2014-2017 tried to gaslight social isolated (or blatantly ugly) men into adopting trans or gay lifestyles. This failed, of course, to catch on probably because the clients were cringing.

I had the misfortunate of having a psychologist who was a poundland version of Magnus Hirschfeld. Like the dirty jew this psychologist was jewish and also tried to peddle homosexual and pedophillic advice.
 

Mafia

looks theorist
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Threads
1,440
Posts
18,234
Reputation
14,713
True. I think I read that only 3% of males are naturally homosexual, the rest is indoctrination or just impressionable vulnerable people.
Male sexuality is more fluid than female because they need to cope as most men are sexually (and as a result) entirely worthless.

Gayness is probably just some sort of release valve so people don't go killing each other and society could develop. The losers put their dicks in each other while the few chads have all the women to themselves.

This is how I think society may have functioned before civilization (though things are now returning to these old ways).

Like psychologists in 2014-2017 tried to gaslight social isolated (or blatantly ugly) men into adopting trans or gay lifestyles. This failed, of course, to catch on probably because the clients were cringing.
No it is catching on, now more than ever.

Maybe this is partly why LGBT is so promoted today. They know there is not a woman for most young men, and most women may even die single because they spent their young years chasing chads and end up with nothing.
 

megadrive

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2020
Threads
18
Posts
607
Reputation
309
This is how I think society may have functioned before civilization (though things are now returning to these old ways).
It was and even Alexander The Great was "tri-sexual". Meaning he liked women (including his own mother or even foreign women), he liked men (including Hephaestion his friend, co commander and lover) and he liked effeminate men who beared resemblance to women (femboys?).

Yet despite rumours Alexander the Great laid the foundations for Christianity (via Mithraism), Christianity would of course preach Sodom and Gomorrah (anti-homosexuality biblical story) Adam and Eve's go forth and multiply (heterosexual reproduction) and hermaphrodites (women appearing to be men, and men appearing to be a woman to stop reproduction via the Devil's trickery).

But during military campaigns, yes men would have a designated lover and may never have felt a woman's touch.

No it is catching on, now more than ever.
I meant it being used in psychotherapy on adults and a low conversion rate (literally!) on grown men who'll cope by "going mgtow" instead.

Yes gay bars are popular moreso they thrive, whereas straight nigthclubs are a thing of the past. Women aren't fucking their looksmatches because of pointless hypergamy and delusional about snaring a Chad (long-term).
That said I see a lot of tall athletic blokes with short obese girlfriends and children. The kids will grow up to eventually be fat themselves.

The attention is now focused on corrupting playgroups in non-religious areas with lgbt training and indoctrination. Cartoons and story books are full of sodomy and the rainbow flag is associated with what it is now..............

Maybe this is partly why LGBT is so promoted today. They know there is not a woman for most young men, and most women may even die single because they spent their young years chasing chads and end up with nothing.
Western birth rates are being lowered, immigrants are reproducing more babies and humourless Chads are idolised on TV. When was the last time you saw a an eccentric male celebrity or comedian from the working class on TV?
That's why I cancelled my subscription I can't relate to the ethnics, fat feminists or every male tv presenter/actor just being for fat women to perv at.
 
Last edited:

Mafia

looks theorist
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Threads
1,440
Posts
18,234
Reputation
14,713
But during military campaigns, yes men would have a designated lover and may never have felt a woman's touch.
Most men in history died incel. It was only recently with the advent of civilization that monogamy alleviated this but it's now becoming undone.

Yes gay bars are popular moreso they thrive, whereas straight nigthclubs are a thing of the past.
Because gay people are more deviant, and they require their own spaces to meet their like-minded

The attention is now focused on corrupting playgroups in non-religious areas with lgbt training and indoctrination. Cartoons and story books are full of sodomy and the rainbow flag is associated with what it is now..............
The women crisis won't matter if everyone's gay. LGBT promotion seems like it would be effective in keeping a society docile.

Imagine if the western world was heterocentric. Then the blackpill wouldn't be able to be ignored and men's issues pushed aside.
 

G3yway

sashimi specialist
⚔ Slayer ⚔
Joined
Dec 19, 2019
Threads
131
Posts
2,188
Reputation
1,239
To a Christian you're asking them to commit a sin that could damn their soul to hellfire, you may as well ask if they would kill a baby for 1 million. And its something that cant happen in reality so its pointless anyway except for someone's gay fantasy.
what if you use da money for good, it is just as evil to slave away for your whole life to help some evil company
 
Top