To clarify, I'm not saying looks don't matter

Legit Theory

Feminist Lib-Jock
a
a
Philisopher King
Retired
a
Joined
Oct 20, 2019
Threads
350
Posts
2,903
Reputation
2,226
It would be retarded to say that.

Hypergamy, however does not exist and women are subjected to harder reality when it comes to physical beauty.

Also it is not the reason you are incel. You are incel because of your feminine brain and lack of a social life.
 
M

Mogger

Guest
Hypergamy, however does not exist



women are subjected to harder reality when it comes to physical beauty.
 

Tsunayoshi Sawada

Dylsexic
a
a
a
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Threads
2,165
Posts
16,392
Reputation
11,433




I think i know this guy from lookism there is no point linikg studies
 

Legit Theory

Feminist Lib-Jock
a
a
Philisopher King
Retired
a
Joined
Oct 20, 2019
Threads
350
Posts
2,903
Reputation
2,226
Incels are v low iq. I don't even have to read the whole study to know how

This is after spending hours on the internet and

5.1 Women feel sexual disgust when they imagine even talking to an unattractive man

Men feel the same about whales.

5.2 70% of women would avoid someone solely based on their looks, compared to 31% of men
Women are more fearful and anxious than men
5.3 Love at first sight can be predicted by physical attractiveness
Man on moon.
5.9 A man's personality only matters to a woman if he meets her basic looks cutoff first
N=80. Lmao, just pictures again. What else are they going to rate on, voice personality when they just have pics and text? lmao.

5.4 Looks are most important to women in speed
5.5 Looks are most important to women in video dating
5.6 Looks are most important to women in blind dating
Yeah this would be the same for men, and its just face. Why do all of these isolate behavior, money and status.

5.7 It is Looks > Personality > Money for both genders, but women lie more about it
This one is just fallacious
5.8 Your looks define perception of your personality in online dating
Yawn more online shit

5.10 Being unattractive reduces men's chances of finding partners, but not women's

The only one that seems promising.
5.11 In short-term dating and provided many options, women care more about looks than men

5.12 'Very unattractive' women are more likely to be married than other women
Ugly people get married and have sex with other uglys. This is also framed wrong

5.13 Women are less likely to use a condom with a more attractive male partner
Neat

5.14 A man's masculinity and physical attractiveness predicts a woman's chance of orgasm
Man on moon

5.15 A man's physical attractiveness to other women predicts his partner's chance of orgasm
Man on moon

5.16 The attractiveness gap in a couple predicts how long they wait before engaging in sex
Makes sense
 

Auntie Kim

Well-known member
Philisopher King
Joined
Dec 17, 2019
Threads
460
Posts
3,043
Reputation
509




lmao nice
 

Narnia

‌‌
Retired
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Threads
54
Posts
1,206
Reputation
928
Hypergami does exist, but it not solely based on looks obviously...
 
M

Mogger

Guest
Incels are v low iq. I don't even have to read the whole study to know how

This is after spending hours on the internet and
I'm not sure if you really believe a one sentence blurb can debunk this scientific study together put together by multiple doctors or youre just trolling

1. I dont know what man on the moon means
2. This is just fallacious is not an argument
3. All online studies are replicated in other environments
4. N=80 + all the other studies combined
5. Women are stricter than men as evidenced by the other studies...
 
M

Mogger

Guest
I'm not sure if you really believe a one sentence blurb can debunk this scientific together put together by multiple doctors

1. I dont know what man on the moon means
2. This is just fallacious is not an argument
3. All online studies are replicated in other environments
4. N=80 + all the other studies combined
5. Women are stricter than men as evidenced by the other studies...
I will post this here since this is a more point by point rebuttal of some of the arguments used



I'd like to see a study proving that true and to the same extent women do as this one disputes that

This is also whataboutism regardless

I'm not sure how this would explain the data trend at all nor how its relevant

Not sure what this means either

5.9 A man's personality only matters to a woman if he meets her basic looks cutoff first
N=80. Lmao, just pictures again. What else are they going to rate on, voice personality when they just have pics and text? lmao.
They reciprocated this study in every single possible dating environment

5.4 Looks are most important to women in speed
5.5 Looks are most important to women in video dating
5.6 Looks are most important to women in blind dating
Yeah this would be the same for men, and its just face. Why do all of these isolate behavior, money and status.
Once again whataboutism and as previously shown men do not have strict requirements for looks, they do rate based off looks but they are

1. Honest about it
2. Not as harsh

This just denial, plain and simple


Replicated in other environments as well

5.10 Being unattractive reduces men's chances of finding partners, but not women's
You didnt even respond to this one
 

Legit Theory

Feminist Lib-Jock
a
a
Philisopher King
Retired
a
Joined
Oct 20, 2019
Threads
350
Posts
2,903
Reputation
2,226

Majority of these that aren't tinder aka capitaizing on non-nt men's high sex drive aren't even looks based

Majority of these studies can be replicated using men and get similar results.

I'd expected such a bold site name to not be reduced to rubble by an intellectual so fastly
 
M

Mogger

Guest


Majority of these that aren't tinder aka capitaizing on non-nt men's high sex drive aren't even looks based

Majority of these studies can be replicated using men and get similar results.

I'd expected such a bold site name to not be reduced to rubble by an intellectual so fastly
Why are you responding to the less hard hitting ones?

Like do you really expect me to respond to all this btw... I've never been gish galloped in an online forum so this is a first


Are we ready to admit that are disagreement with the blackpill is emotional and not rational
 
M

Mogger

Guest
Why are you responding to the less hard hitting ones?

Like do you really expect me to respond to all this btw... I've never been gish galloped in an online forum so this is a first


Are we ready to admit that are disagreement with the blackpill is emotional and not rational
And btw the social status ones do NOT account for the halo effect


Most social status/personality affirming studies are better explained by the halo effect

Social status = halo effect, personality = halo effect
 

Legit Theory

Feminist Lib-Jock
a
a
Philisopher King
Retired
a
Joined
Oct 20, 2019
Threads
350
Posts
2,903
Reputation
2,226
I responded to all of them.
@Mogger

The only legit one was the one from Spain that had the sample size of n= 1204. very interesting cultural case there. Rest are man on moon and don't prove hypergamy to an intellectual like me. I don't think the same results would happen in the UK

Like I said bulk of the "evidence" is from hornballs on online dating apps.
 
M

Mogger

Guest
I responded to all of them.
@"Mogger"

The only legit one was the one from Spain that had the sample size of 1204. very interesting cultural case there. Rest are man on moon and don't prove hypergamy to me.

Like I said bulk of the "evidence" is from hornballs on online dating apps
You didnt really "respond" to any of them


The majority of the studies are done in the field, only some of them are from online dating.



I googled man on the moon and found this "(putting a) man on the moon is seen as a virtually impossible task, but, since we did it, the (faulty reasoning is that we can do virtually any impossible task"

I'm not sure how this applies to our conversation could you elaborate?
 
Top